📘 ❞ A Study of Anthropomorphism and Transcendence in the Bible and Qur an ❝ كتاب ــ ذو الفقار على شاه اصدار 1997
مقارنة الأديان - 📖 كتاب ❞ A Study of Anthropomorphism and Transcendence in the Bible and Qur an ❝ ــ ذو الفقار على شاه 📖
█ _ ذو الفقار شاه 1997 حصريا كتاب ❞ A Study of Anthropomorphism and Transcendence in the Bible Qur an ❝ 2025 an: s God dead? asked Time magazine in its issue of April 8 1960 Yes "God is dead'% responded three American scholars These were Thomas Altizer Emory University Atlanta; William Hamilton Colgate Rochester Divinity School, and Paul Van Buren Temple ' This bold response to a very extraordinary question proved be the birth "The Death God" school one culmination centuries curiosities, research, inquiry concerning "Transcendent theism claims about death God neither unusual nor new It had been implied writings many philosophers scientists But speak "the modem grab invoke name Friedrich Nietzsche (1844 1900), who raised his cry these words at end last century Writing stages process God's death, observed, that ancient people gods First, gave way "an old grim beard" "a jealous" when ungodliest utterance came from himself " He declared "There but God! Thou shalt have no other before me! Then all gods, as puts it, laughing shaking upon their thrones exclaimed interesting secret: "Is it not just divinity there are Gods God? ", expired laughter The multiple deities, according Nietzsche, energetic useful they connected with some human needs or forces nature replaced them was so transcendent he beyond humans creating Will 4 On hand, too much intrusive, disturbing, involved affairs beheld every thing, also man: die! Man cannot endure such witness should live "' Commenting on Nietzsche's observations, Ramsey explains "was with us, human, too human form He mixed affkirs, even manifesting this miserable flesh In sense, fellow humanity killed him further observes, "After made man's image, proposed make remake man his own die 0 "death necessary liberate unlimited restrictions called religious interpretations universe imposed cultural products men writes Karl Lowith, "demands wills himself, whom says what must do, transcends same time freed Men autonomous creators cultures destinies They used accomplish task by projecting into cosmos fears aspirations, now could achieve autonomy through science philosophy I So dead hearts men, rationalism Livingston, outcome development ultimate ground support traditional values For over two thousand years derived "thou shalt" not" God, coming an "" By "half poetic, half prophetic" "phrase meant represent those great critics theistic understanding asserted for past traditional, official, has lost His authority usefulness world phrase implies "In consciousness sense died worshipped Creator universe, more accepted creator surroundings fact, around created image himself projection theories source notions divine images fifteenth century, Francis Bacon (1561 1626) virtually substantiated Cicero's observations noting beings things rely causes t مقارنة الأديان مجاناً PDF اونلاين الدين المقارن هو أحد فروع دراسة التي تهتم بالموازنة المنظمة للعقائد والممارسات أديان العالم هذا ركن خاص بالكتب المجانيه مجال وما يتعلق بها
كتاب
A Study of Anthropomorphism and Transcendence in the Bible and Qur an
ــ ذو الفقار على شاه
صدر 1997م كتاب
A Study of Anthropomorphism and Transcendence in the Bible and Qur an
ــ ذو الفقار على شاه
صدر 1997م- مساهمة من: NOOR
( الأربعاء 27 مارس 2019 ( 7:09 مساءً )) - تبليغ عن سوء استخدام
s God
dead?
asked
Time
magazine
in
its
issue
of
April
8
1960.
Yes
"God
is
dead'%
responded
three
American
scholars.
These
were
Thomas
Altizer
of
Emory
University
in
Atlanta;
William
Hamilton
of
Colgate-Rochester
Divinity
School,
and
Paul
Van
Buren
of
Temple
University.
'
This
bold
response
to
a
very
extraordinary
question
proved
to
be
the
birth
of
"The
Death
of
God"
school
and
one
culmination
of
centuries
of
curiosities,
research,
and
inquiry
concerning
the
"Transcendent
God"
of
theism.
These
claims
about
the
death
of
God
were
neither
unusual
nor
new.
It
had
been
implied
in
the
writings
of
many
a
philosophers
and
scientists.
But
to
speak
of
"the
death
of
God"
in
its
modem
grab
is
to
invoke
the
name
of
Friedrich
Nietzsche
(1844-1900),
'
who
raised
his
cry
in
these
very
words
at
the
end
of
last
century.
Writing
about
the
stages
in
the
process
of
God's
death,
Nietzsche
observed,
that
ancient
people
had
many
gods.
First,
the
many
gods
gave
way
to
"an
old
grim-beard".
"a
jealous"
God
when
"the
ungodliest
utterance
came
from
a
God
himself
" He
declared
that
"There
is
but
one
God!
Thou
shalt
have
no
other
gods
before
me!
"
Then
all
other
gods,
as
Nietzsche
puts
it,
laughing
and
shaking
upon
their
thrones
exclaimed
the
interesting
secret:
"Is
it
not
just
divinity
that
there
are
Gods
but
no
God?
",
and
expired
from
their
laughter.
'
The
old
multiple
deities,
according
to
Nietzsche,
were
energetic
and
useful
as
they
were
connected
with
some
human
needs
or
some
forces
in
the
nature.
The
one
God
who
replaced
them
was
so
transcendent
that
he
was
beyond
humans
creating
Will.
4
On
the
other
hand,
he
was
too
much
intrusive,
disturbing,
and
involved
in
human
affairs.
"The
God
who
beheld
every
thing,
and
also
man:
that
God
had
to
die!
Man
cannot
endure
that
such
a witness
should
live.
"' Commenting
on
Nietzsche's
observations,
Paul
Ramsey
explains
that
such
a
God
"was
too
much
God-with
us,
God
in
human,
all-too-human
form.
He
mixed
too
much
in
human
affkirs,
even
manifesting
himself
in
this
miserable
flesh.
In
a
sense,
God's
fellow-humanity
killed
him.
"' He
further
observes,
that
"After
the
gods
made
in
man's
image,
the
God
who
proposed
to
make
and
remake
man
in his
own
image,
that
God
too
had
to
die.
0
The
"death
of
God"
was
necessary
to
liberate
man
from
the
unlimited
restrictions
or
so-called
religious
interpretations
of
man
and
the
universe
that
were
imposed
in
the
name
of
God
upon
the
cultural
products
of
men.
This
death,
writes
Karl
Lowith,
"demands
of
the
man
who
wills
himself,
to
whom
no
God
says
what
he
must
do,
that
he
transcends
man
at
the
same
time
as
he
is
freed
from
God.
"'
Men
were
to
be
autonomous
and
unlimited
creators
of
their
cultures
and
destinies.
They
used
to
accomplish
this
task
by
projecting
into
cosmos
their
fears
and
aspirations,
by
creating
their
gods,
but
now
they
could
achieve
this
autonomy
through
science
and
philosophy.
I
So.
Nietzsche
observes,
"God
is
dead
in
the
hearts
of
men,
science
and
rationalism
have
killed
him.
"'
Livingston,
observes,
that
the
outcome
of
this
development
is
"the
death
of
the
ultimate
ground
and
support
of
all
traditional
values.
For
over
two
thousand
years
men
have
derived
their
"thou
shalt"
and
"thou
shalt
not"
from
God,
but
that
is
now
coming
to
an
end.
""
By
this
"half-poetic,
half-prophetic"
"phrase
Nietzsche
meant
to
represent
those
great
many
critics
of
theistic
understanding
of
God
who
had
asserted
for
the
past
many
centuries
that
the
traditional,
official,
and
transcendent
God
of
theism
has
lost
His
authority
over
and
usefulness
to
the
world.
This
phrase
implies
that
"In
man
the
consciousness
of
an
ultimate
in
the
traditional
sense
has
died.
""
The
God
who
used
to
be
worshipped
as
Creator
of
the
universe,
is
no
more
accepted
as
the
creator
of
man
and
his
surroundings.
In
fact,
it
is
the
other
way
around.
It
is
man
who
created
God
in
his
own
image
in himself
The
projection
theories
or
claims
about
the
human
source
of
notions
of
the
divine
the
images
of
divine.
"
In
the
fifteenth
century,
Francis
Bacon
(1561-1626)
virtually
substantiated
Cicero's
observations
by
noting
that
human
beings
in
their
understanding
of
things
rely
upon
causes
t
#1K
0 مشاهدة هذا اليوم#77K
0 مشاهدة هذا الشهر#51K
6K إجمالي المشاهدات
- 🎁 كن أول كاتب اقتباس في هذه الصفحة واحصل على هديّة 15 من النقاط فوراً 🎁
